“Defending the Consumption Tax”: What Japan’s Tax Debate Reveals About Its Future
In June 2025, Hiroshi Moriyama, Secretary-General of Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), made headlines with his statement: “We will defend the consumption tax at all costs.”
This declaration has sparked significant debate in Japanese society, especially as the country heads into its Upper House elections.
For those in the United States and England interested in understanding Japan’s current affairs, this article explains the background and implications of this issue.
What Is the Consumption Tax?
Japan’s consumption tax is a value-added tax (VAT) that applies to almost all goods and services purchased in the country.
The current rate is 10%, making it a major source of government revenue. As Japan faces rapid population aging, the costs of pensions, healthcare, and elder care are rising—making the consumption tax a crucial pillar for funding social security.
The Background of Moriyama’s Statement
During a speech in Nara Prefecture, Moriyama stated, “We will defend the consumption tax at all costs. Advocating for tax cuts without presenting alternative sources of revenue is populist politics.”
This was a direct response to opposition parties, who have been campaigning for a reduction in the consumption tax as a way to ease the burden of rising living costs.
The LDP argues that the consumption tax is essential for stable social security funding and opposes tax cuts.
Instead, their main proposal to address inflation is a one-time cash payment of 20,000 yen (about $130) per person, which they say is equivalent to the average annual consumption tax paid on food.
Public and Social Media Reaction
Moriyama’s remarks quickly trended on Japanese social media. Critics argued that the government should focus on protecting citizens rather than the tax itself, while supporters praised his consistency and realism. The debate reflects deep divisions in public opinion.
Key Policy Differences
| Issue | LDP (Moriyama’s Position) | Opposition Parties (e.g., Constitutional Democratic Party) |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption Tax | Maintain (no reduction) | Promise to reduce the tax |
| Inflation Measures | One-time cash payment | Reduction of the consumption tax |
| Social Security Funding | Emphasizes consumption tax | Focus on alternative funding sources |
The LDP believes that maintaining the consumption tax is necessary for social stability. In contrast, opposition parties prioritize reducing the tax to directly ease household burdens.
Why This Debate Matters
Japan is one of the world’s most rapidly aging societies, making the question of how to fund social security a critical national issue. The choice between maintaining the consumption tax or reducing it is not just about tax rates—it’s about the future direction of Japanese society.
A Message for Voters
This debate touches the very foundation of Japan’s tax and social security systems. As Japanese voters consider their choices, it’s important to compare each party’s policies and rationale, and to think about which approach will best serve both individuals and society as a whole.
Meta Keywords
Japan consumption tax, Japanese politics, social security in Japan, Japanese elections, LDP, Hiroshi Moriyama, Japanese tax system, Japan inflation, Japanese opposition parties, Japan policy debate
Comments